tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3625077740214410320.post3666069166611922038..comments2024-03-28T03:29:13.170-04:00Comments on <center><img src="http://froginawell.com/3.png"><img src="http://froginawell.com/w.gif"></center>: THERE IS NO GAY GENE!Frog Blog Boyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00086939950507122287noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3625077740214410320.post-36750221537725066222021-12-08T09:13:47.141-05:002021-12-08T09:13:47.141-05:00เว็บสล็อตตรงแตกง่าย Make your own winning story.<a href="https://g2gcyber.com/" rel="nofollow">เว็บสล็อตตรงแตกง่าย</a> Make your own winning story.g2g123https://www.blogger.com/profile/03114725113273620618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3625077740214410320.post-60004053002223108632014-09-09T15:14:08.971-04:002014-09-09T15:14:08.971-04:00Thanks for your essay. I’ve read it carefully. It ...Thanks for your essay. I’ve read it carefully. It is well-written and well-thought out. And yes, FrogBook.com’s headlines can sometimes be quite eye-catching but the text itself may occasionally contain a few twists and turns! <br /><br />In regard to Alfred Kinsey’s research, it has its flaws. While the samples he used for his research were extremely large, they were mostly not random (1948 for males). The field of statistics was not yet well understood at the time. For example, the polls in 1948 all predicted that Thomas Dewey would win the presidential election over Harry Truman. Some newspapers even printed it as their headline the night before. This was because the pollsters’ samples were not RANDOM. So, people who participated in Kinsey’s surveys might NOT be representative of the general population. Therefore, I’m not sure your assertion about modern research is correct. I trust the best and most-noted papers published in modern times do indeed use random samples as well as being double-blind. <br /><br />But Kinsey’s research did expose the fact that human bisexuality, or what he called ambisexuality, is an innate part all human beings. However, if ambisexuality is such a powerful force in human nature, then why is conversion therapy such an unadulterated disaster? You would think vigorous psychological conditioning would be able to neutralize at least some of the “social causes” that you have proposed about homosexuality. <br /><br />Is there a biological. if not genetic, correlation with something as subtle as “taste?” For example, people who have a favorite food tend to have relatives that have the same favorite food (also, please review the article about homosexual men and their maternal female relatives). However, this does not mean that they are unable to eat other foods or even find them distasteful. It simply means that they are more happy, more “whole,” if they are able to enjoy their favorite food more often. Same with sexuality. Many gay men can have sex with women and enjoy it. But they are more complete, more happy and content, as a human being if they have a male partner. This is not independent of human physiology. <br /><br />A society who’s people are fully self-actualized is a society that is at its zenith. Frog Blog Boyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00086939950507122287noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3625077740214410320.post-60260994189173214242014-09-09T07:05:24.206-04:002014-09-09T07:05:24.206-04:00There is no “gay” gene or “straight” gene. This i...There is no “gay” gene or “straight” gene. This is not to say that it is a ‘choice,’ because most would choose the status quo. But the title of this article is completely misleading. Even the researchers admit that the percentage is low. The mere fact that the gene is not found in 100% of gays proves that genetics are not the sole factor. In fact most behavioral genetics are complex interactions of environment, genes, and psychology. There are indeed psychological reasons why someone will become attached sexually to the same-sex… just as being molested at an early age or having certain unique experiences as a child will tend to create different attractions in that person when they get older. Behavioral genetics don’t speak. We can only guess what they do. For example, these genes could have an affect on temperament (like sensitivity, strong fears of abandonment or attachment, or feminine traits, etc.). <br /><br />Kinsey did the best research on the subject and the conclusion was solid… humans are innately bisexual and we fall on a sexual continuum. Many people are indeed bisexual. Many people are solely gay, solely straight, or fall somewhere in between both extremes. The problem is that new studies have a bias toward the selection of overtly gay respondents, a minority of all homosexuals. It’s difficult to study the millions of self-proclaimed straight people w/ hints of homosexual behavior or feelings because this huge unnoticed population will feel shame and humiliation to enter these studies. You will only read their stories on the internet where they feel safe. And another large portion will not even write about it on the internet. Some are in therapist offices right now talking about the phenomenon. <br /><br />These false genetic studies are, for the most part, political ploys aimed at reducing homophobia by putting LGBT people into a minority category. The same goes for the hormonal studies. <br /><br />Exclusive homosexual activity in animals is quite rare.. we see more bisexual behavior (and in many cases such as dogs, you’ll see some dominance/mounting of same-sex), but homosexuality is extremely common in humans. The reason for this points at psycho-social factors playing the biggest role. This doesn’t sit well with many people because gays are fighting for their rights (which they should), and it would be much easier to just say that homosexuality is innate. The good news for them is that it still isn’t a ‘choice’ the way fanatical religious groups want to portrait it. Just as nobody chooses to have ADHD or shyness. However, it is also true that many people can learn to have a bisexual lifestyle if they so desire to work on exploring that other side. <br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com